Finally, Cluster 4 exhibited a pattern of RSFC similar to that of Cluster 2, but with less extensive RSFC with the lateral temporal lobe and the medial frontal cortex, and more extensive RSFC with the dorsal cingulate gyrus and supplementary motor areas, as well as anterior frontal cortex. It may represent a region that would include voxels in the anterior insula region and the frontal opercular

region. Overall, the patterns of Poziotinib supplier RSFC associated with the K = 4 spectral clustering solution were consistent with those of the primary seed-based analysis of the ventrolateral frontal regions, and confirmed a significant distinction between premotor BA 6 and BAs 44 and 45, but greater similarity than difference between BAs 44 and 45 in terms of their RSFC. The traditional view of the cortical language circuit has been of a ventrolateral frontal speech

zone (Broca’s area) in the left hemisphere of the human brain that is associated with a language comprehension zone in the posterior superior temporal region via the arcuate fasciculus (Geschwind, 1970). However, several lines of evidence suggest that cortical language circuits must be much more complex than the classical scheme. Electrical stimulation studies during brain surgery and functional neuroimaging studies have shown that the posterior language zone is very wide and includes not only posterior superior temporal cortex, but also the superior temporal sulcus and the adjacent middle temporal gyrus, as well as the supramarginal and angular gyri of the inferior parietal lobule (e.g. Penfield & Roberts, 1959;

Rasmussen & Milner, 1975; Ojemann PI3K Inhibitor Library mw et al., 1989; Binder et al., 1997). Furthermore, Anacetrapib the ventrolateral frontal language production zone includes three distinct parts: the ventral part of the premotor zone (BA 6) that is involved in the control of the orofacial musculature, as well as area 44 and area 45 that together comprise Broca’s region. Electrical stimulation of ventral premotor area 6 results in vocalization, while stimulation of area 44 and the caudal part of area 45 results in speech arrest (e.g. Penfield & Roberts, 1959; Rasmussen & Milner, 1975; Ojemann et al., 1989). Establishing the similarities and differences in connectivity of these three ventrolateral frontal areas involved in language production with the perisylvian posterior parietal and temporal regions that constitute the posterior language zone is critical to our understanding of the neural networks underlying language processing. Experimental anatomical tracing studies in the macaque monkey have shown that a major branch of the superior longitudinal fasciculus links the inferior parietal region with the ventrolateral frontal region (Petrides & Pandya, 1984) and a major pathway running in the extreme capsule links the lateral temporal region with the ventrolateral frontal region (Petrides & Pandya, 1988).