With a willingness to pay of 2,500 Euro, these percentages would

With a willingness to pay of 2,500 Euro, these percentages would be 90% and ∼50%, respectively, for malnourished and well-nourished patients. Fig. 3 Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve BLZ945 presenting the probability that the nutritional intervention is cost-effective (y-axis), given various ceiling ratios for selleck products willingness to pay (x-axis) with respect to weight increase. Sensitivity analyses performed for age groups and nutritional status at baseline, according to the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) With respect to QALYs, if the nutritional

intervention was targeted to patients aged between 55 and 74 years, with a willingness to pay of 20,000 Euro, the probability that the intervention was cost-effective

was 85%, compared with only 26% in patients aged 75 years and above (Fig. 4). If the willingness to pay is 80,000 Euro for one QALY, the probability for the nutritional intervention to be cost-effective in the younger group increases to 98% while, in the older group, the probability remains the same. As also shown in Fig. 4, at a willingness to pay 20,000 Euro for one QALY, the probability that the nutritional intervention was cost-effective were 20% in malnourished patients and ∼25% in well-nourished patients. JNJ-26481585 solubility dmso With increasing willingness to pay, the probability that the intervention was cost-effective remained similar in malnourished patients whereas, in well-nourished patients, the probability that intervention was cost-effective increased up to ∼60% at a willingness to pay 80,000 Euro. Fig. 4 Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve presenting the probability that the nutritional intervention is cost-effective (y-axis), given various ceiling ratios for willingness to pay (x-axis) with respect to QALY. Sensitivity analyses performed for age groups and this website nutritional status at baseline, according to the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) Discussion Nutritional intervention in elderly hip fracture patients has been proposed as an approach to improve clinical outcome. Despite several decades of research, the overall evidence for the effectiveness

of ONS in elderly hip fracture patients with respect to length of stay and functional outcome is limited [42], and no thorough economic evaluation of nutritional intervention in elderly subjects after hip fracture has been performed so far. In the present study, we assessed the cost-effectiveness of an intensive nutritional intervention combining frequent dietetic counseling and ONS for 3 months postoperatively in elderly hip fracture patients. Results showed that the direct costs of the nutritional intervention were low—613 Euro per treated patient. Total health care costs, patient and family costs, as well as subcategories of these costs were similar in the intervention and control group.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>