The pooled estimate of BCLC B+C stage 1-year survival rate was 34% (95%CI, 22-48; range, 3%-75%). There was a statistically significant heterogeneity among studies, P < 0.0001 (Fig. 4A). The pooled estimate of BCLC B stage 1-year survival rate was 49.6% (95%CI, 32-75; range, 3%-75%). There was a statistically significant heterogeneity among studies, P < 0.0001 (Supporting Fig. 1A). The pooled estimate of BCLC C stage 1-year survival rate was 25% (95%CI, 14-40; range, 3%-63%). There was

a statistically selleck screening library significant heterogeneity among studies, P < 0.0001 (Supporting Fig. 1B). The pooled estimate of BCLC D stage 1-year survival rate was 11% (95%CI, 4.7-22; range, 0-57%), and there was a statistically significant heterogeneity among studies, P < 0.0001 (Fig. 4B). We in turn excluded each study to ensure that no single study would be solely responsible for the heterogeneity of any result (so-called robust analysis). In all the robust analyses, heterogeneity among studies was significant. Moreover, in all the sensitivity analyses

excluding the 2 RCTs with the highest and the lowest survival rates, heterogeneity was significant. Regression analysis for the B+C stage studies showed that six variables were associated with an increased 1-year survival rate: studies published before 2000 (P = 0.001), low prevalence of alcohol-related disease (P = 0.016), high prevalence of HCV-related disease Midostaurin in vivo (P = 0.021), high

percentage click here of ECOG PS = 0 patients (P = 0.001), low percentage of patients with ascites (P = 0.001), and high percentage of Okuda stage I patients (P = 0.001) (Table 3). Regression analysis for the D stage studies showed that three variables were associated with an increased 1-year survival rate: North American and European studies (P = 0.006), low percentage of HBV-related disease (P = 0.004), and low percentage of portal vein thrombosis (P = 0.01) To examine any potential differences in study features, we next calculated pooled estimates of the 1-year survival rate within each stratum and evaluated heterogeneity among strata. However, heterogeneity was equally evident in all strata (Supporting Table 5). The funnel and the Egger publication bias plots for 1-year survival rates are shown in Supporting Fig. 2. The plots and the Egger test for publication bias showed that the risk of having missed or overlooked trials was significant: the P value was 0.0003 with the Egger test. The funnel and the Egger publication bias plots for 2-year survival rates are shown in Supporting Fig. 3. The plots and the Egger test for publication bias showed that the risk of having missed or overlooked trials was significant: the P value was 0.003 with the Egger test.