It seems that the growing use of Kinesio Taping is due to massive marketing campaigns (such as the ones used during the London 2012 Olympic Apoptosis inhibitor Games) rather than high-quality, scientific evidence with clinically relevant outcomes. The widespread use of Kinesio Taping in musculoskeletal and sports physical therapy is probably further reinforced by the authors in some of the included trials concluding that Kinesio Taping was effective when their data did not identify significant benefits. Policymakers and clinicians should carefully consider the costs and the effectiveness of this intervention when deciding whether
to use this intervention. Although Kinesio Taping is widely used in clinical practice, the current evidence does not support the use of this intervention. However, the conclusions from this review are based on a number of underpowered studies. Therefore large and well-designed trials are greatly needed. The research group for this review is currently conducting two large randomised
controlled trials, which are investigating the use of Kinesio Taping in people with chronic low back pain; they should provide new and high-quality information on this topic. One of them31 Onalespib compares different types of application of Kinesio Taping in 148 participants with non-specific chronic low back pain, with the outcomes of pain intensity, disability and global impression of recovery. The second trial32 tests the effectiveness of the addition of Kinesio Taping to conventional physical therapy treatment in 148 participants with chronic non-specific low back pain, with the outcomes of pain intensity, disability, global impression of recovery and satisfaction with care. It is expected that these two trials will contribute to a better understanding of this
intervention’s effectiveness. What is already known on this topic: Kinesio Tape is thinner and more elastic than conventional tape. Kinesio Taping involves application of the tape while applying tension to the tape and/or with the target muscle in a stretched position. Recent systematic reviews of trials of Kinesio Taping have identified insufficient, low-quality evidence about its effects, but new trials of Kinesio Taping are being Astemizole published frequently. What this study adds: When used for a range of musculoskeletal conditions, Kinesio Taping had no benefit over sham taping/placebo and active comparison therapies,the benefit was too small to be clinically worthwhile, or the trials were of low quality. Therefore, current evidence does not support the use of Kinesio Taping for musculoskeletal conditions. Some authors concluded that Kinesio Taping was effective when their data did not identify significant benefit. eAddenda: Figure 3 and Appendix 1 can be found online at doi:10.1016/j.jphys.2013.12.