4 was similar Thus, in both groups, the main epitope recognized

4 was similar. Thus, in both groups, the main epitope recognized was P3 (Fig. 3A). TB10.4 is thought to be co-transcribed and secreted from M.tb and BCG in a tight 1:1 heterodimer complex with Rv0287, also known as TB9.8 19–21. To study whether complex formation of TB10.4/Rv0287 could influence which TB10.4 epitopes were CH5424802 research buy recognized, mice were immunized with TB10.4 complexed with Rv0287 formulated

in CAF01. To assure that the TB10.4-Rv0287 complex was stable in CAF01, TB10.4-His-Rv0287 complex was bound to nickel beads and exposed to CAF01 at 37°C for 1 h, but this did not lead to dissociation of the complex and release of TB10.4 into the supernatant. Instead, after removal of CAF01 the untagged TB10.4 remained associated with the nickel beads in the pellet (Fig. 3B). Splenocytes were isolated after the third

immunization with TB10.4/Rv0287 complex in CAF01 and the epitope recognition was analyzed as described above. The histogram in Fig. 3C showed that the major epitope recognized by IFN-γ-producing T cells in the spleen was still P3, and to a lesser extent P7 and P8, which was similar to the epitope recognition pattern seen after immunization with TB10.4 monomer as shown in Fig. 3A. Thus, secretion of TB10.4 in a complex with Rv0287 by BCG and M.tb most likely does not alter TB10.4 epitope recognition by T cells. Moreover, the epitope patterns induced by BCG and TB10.4 were not mutually exclusive since priming filipin with BCG and boosting with TB10.4 induced P3-, P7-, P8- and P9-specific T cells (Fig. 3D). In summary, neither EPZ-6438 manufacturer post-translational modifications nor complex formation with Rv0287 appear to explain the observed TB10.4 CD4+ T-cell epitope differences observed. Different APC have been shown to vary with regard to Ag processing pathways as well as the ability to protect potential T-cell epitopes from degradation before MHC-loading 9, 22. Thus, we next studied whether TB10.4 and BCG vaccines differed with regard to cellular uptake

at the local draining LN (dLN), as it could be speculated that uptake into different cell types could lead to different Ag processing/epitope recognition patterns which could explain some of our observations 9. Mice were injected in the right hind footpad once with AlexaFluor-488 (AF488) conjugated TB10.4/CAF01, or with recombinant BCG expressing the enhanced GFP (BCG-eGFP), in order to examine which cell types ingested the vaccines in the popliteal LN following footpad vaccination. Figure 4A shows the percentage of cells containing ingested fluorescent vaccine. The results showed that after 3 days, the group immunized with TB10. 4-AF488 had a larger percentage of cells in the popliteal LN with ingested vaccine (0.23% of popliteal LN cells) than popliteal LN cells from mice injected with BCG-eGFP (0.07% of cells), suggesting a more rapid or efficient lymphoid drainage and uptake of TB10.4 compared to BCG. In support of this, soluble TB10.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>