001). This decrease in size was complemented by both orthologs of CsrA (p<0.001). As Romeo suggested that the size differences between the mutant and wild type may be due to the

role of endogenous glycogen cellular morphology, it is possible that the presence of arabinose used for protein expression may play a 3-MA purchase separate metabolic role within the cell leading to the observed phenotype. A number of studies have shown that regulation of mRNA targets by E. coli CsrA is complex [12, 15, 35, 41]. Mercante et al. [41] showed that proper regulation depends on simultaneous binding of E. coli Avapritinib cost CsrA to multiple sites on target mRNAs, involving both of the RNA-binding surfaces of CsrA, using a multi-site bridging mechanism, and also the formation of higher order ribonucleoprotein complexes. Therefore, it is possible that the lack of regulation of the E. coli glg genes by C.

jejuni CsrA is not due just to simple binding of one glg site vs. another, but rather due to changes in the dynamics (i.e. not ‘all or nothing’) of one or more of find more these bridging or ribonucleoprotein formation processes. For example, even moderately decreased affinity of C. jejuni CsrA for one of the glg sites may inhibit the formation of multi-site bridges and ribonucleoprotein complexes and therefore not result in productive regulation. Finally, the binding of some but not all E. coli CsrA binding sites by C. jejuni Glycogen branching enzyme CsrA infers that ε-proteobacterial CsrA binding sites are likely to show at least subtle differences from such sites in E. coli. It further underscores that predictive algorithms based solely or primarily on E. coli CsrA binding sites may be problematic for identifying CsrA binding sites in ε-proteobacteria and other divergent bacteria (Figure

1) [30], and that experimental approaches are preferable (such studies are ongoing in our lab). Conclusions This study has shown that CsrA from the ε-proteobacteria C. jejuni exhibits substantial sequence divergence compared to previously studied CsrA regulators from other bacteria, including in the RNA-binding domains. The ability of C. jejuni CsrA to complement some, but not all, phenotypes of an E. coli csrA mutant demonstrates both conservation and divergence of function, and suggests that the C. jejuni ortholog may have differences in binding specificity relative to its E. coli counterpart. Studies to define the C. jejuni CsrA RNA binding site are ongoing. Acknowledgements We are grateful to Dr. Tony Romeo (University of Florida) and Dr. Adrianne Edwards (Emory University) for providing E. coli strains MG1655 and TRMG1655. We are also grateful to the members of the Thompson laboratory, Mr. Robert Smith (GHSU Electron Microscopy Core), and Dr. Tiffany L.