The clinical significance of this phenomenon is not clear and further research is warranted. Furthermore, there are reassuring results from the limited studies that have examined the effect on MTCT of amniocentesis and length

of time of ROMs in women on HAART and in those with a VL <50 HIV RNA copies/mL. An association between MTCT and use of instrumental delivery, amniotomy and episiotomy is not supported by data from the pre-HAART era and there is Selleck LY2157299 a lack of data from the HAART era. Therefore, while acknowledging the potential for discordance between the plasma and genital tract VL, the Writing Group felt that there was no compelling evidence to support the continued avoidance of these procedures as well as induction of labour in women on HAART for whom http://www.selleckchem.com/products/PD-0332991.html a vaginal delivery had been recommended based on VL. The data regarding fetal blood sampling and use of scalp electrodes also originate from the pre-HAART era and have yielded conflicting results. The Writing Group acknowledges a lack of data from the HAART era, but concluded that it is unlikely that use

of fetal scalp electrodes or fetal blood sampling confers increased risk of transmission in a woman with an undetectable VL although this cannot be proven from the current evidence. Electronic fetal monitoring should be performed according to national guidelines [224]. HIV infection per se is not an indication for continuous fetal monitoring, as there is no increased risk of intrapartum hypoxia or sepsis. If the woman has no other risk factors, she can be managed by midwives either in a midwifery-led unit or at home. She will need to continue with her HAART through labour and adequate provision needs to be made for examination and testing of the newborn and dispensing of medication to the newborn in a timely fashion. 7.2.3 VBAC should Baricitinib be offered to women with a VL <50 HIV RNA copies/mL. Grading: 1D In the absence of randomized trial data for women with HIV infection who undertake VBAC, evidence to support benefit of VBAC and vaginal birth over

elective CS is limited to expert judgement that is subject to inherent biases. The probability of a successful vaginal delivery remains dependent on current and past obstetric factors. In general, provided that the woman is being cared for in a consultant-led maternity unit and the labour properly monitored with rapid recourse to CS in the face of any difficulty, the outcome of trial of labour for mother and neonate is good, even if scar dehiscence occurs [228]. In the non-HIV population, 70% of VBACs manage a vaginal delivery with a uterine rupture rate of about 0.3%. Therefore, where a vaginal birth has been recommended based on ART and VL, maternal management of the delivery, including a decision regarding VBAC, should be as for an uninfected woman. 7.2.